Legal Opinion
Austin v. Pepperman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 3, 1965No. 3 Div. 21, 21-APublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
The husband of testatrix appeals from a decree construing the will adversely to the husband.
The guardian ad litem for certain minor beneficiaries under the will also appealed and has undertaken to cross-assign errors.
The reporter will set out pertinent provisions of the will and two codicils.
Testatrix died January 28, 1959. The will and first codicil were admitted to probate and J. Ed Pepperman was appointed executor March 6, 1959.
On June 2, 1959, executor filed petition to probate the second codicil, which was admitted to probate June 8, 1959.
Testatrix left an estate which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Peck v. DrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Woods v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brittain v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Zimmerman v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Guste v. Louisiana Milk CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Bradley v. EskridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.