Pothul v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, District Judge.
Defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) presently moves the Court for partial summary judgment precluding Plaintiff from seeking recovery pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., for future wages and benefits that accrued after his discharge from the company for alleged insubordination. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
I. Background and Procedural History
The issue raised by Defendant’s motion is what preclusive effect, if any, should be given to internal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Daniel L. Kulavic, Cross-Appellee v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Ronald Coppinger v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Benjamin v. Traffic Executive Ass'n Eastern RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Delise v. Metro-North RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- PITTER v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011