Legal Opinion

PITTER v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 10, 2011No. 10 Civ. 5679 (VM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

The Court has received a motion in limine from defendant Metro-North Commuter Railroad (“Metro-North”) pertaining to the trial in this matter, which is scheduled to begin November 21, 2011. A summary of Metro-North’s requests and the Court’s rulings thereon follow. Metro-North requests that the Court:(1) Preclude, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence (“FRE”) 402, the testimony of Matthew Byrns (“Byrns”) regarding plaintiff Perry Pitter’s (“Pitter”) progress as an employee for Metro-North and the process by which Metro-North discharges an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Rosello v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014