Legal Opinion

State v. Markeveys

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. AC 17795PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*717 Opinion

LAVERY, J.

The defendant, Matthew Markeveys, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1) and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 53-21, as amended by Public Acts 1995, No. 95-142, claiming that the trial court improperly (1) admitted testimony as an admission by the defendant and (2) instructed the jury on the concept of reasonable doubt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. State v. MorasciniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Demarkey v. FratturoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. John F.M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. NunesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API