Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1952No. 90PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeviN, O. J.

The statutes governing procedure before the Utilities Commission prescribe the rules and extent of review on appeal from an order of the Commission. The statute now codified as G-.S. 62-26.10 provides that on such appeal to the Superior Court the review shall be on the record certified by the Commission and heard by the judge without a jury who may reverse or modify the decision of the Commission if substantial rights have been prejudiced because of findings and conclusions which are unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence. This statute further provides that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Gulf-Atlantic Towing Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API