Legal Opinion

ACOSTA v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 2021No. 5:20-cv-01305-JFMUnknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAIME ACOSTA, : : Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1305 : v. : : SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST; THE : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE : COUNTY OF BERKS; and THE : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE : OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondents. : ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2021, after considering the petition under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the pro se petitioner, Jaime Acosta (Doc. No. 2), the response in opposition to the petition filed by the respondents (Doc. No. 7), United States Magistrate Judge Lynne…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API