Patten v. Raddatz
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
This is an appeal from an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and denying defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm.
We restate the issues on appeal:
I. Did the District Court err when it granted summary judgment in favor of Harold and Betty Patten on Phyllis Raddatz’s counterclaim of negligence?
*278II. Did the District Court err when it granted summary judgment on Phyllis Raddatz’s claim of negligence per se in favor of Harold and Betty Patten?
Phyllis Raddatz (Ms. Raddatz) was involved in a sexual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Simmons v. JenkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Hislop v. CadyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Lencioni v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Thomas v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dobrocke v. City of Columbia FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Harwood v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
- Lombardo v. HeislerMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Patten v. RaddatzMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Tug Valley Pharmacy v. All BelowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.