Tug Valley Pharmacy v. All Below
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
No. 14-0144 - Tug Valley Pharmacy, LLC v. All Plaintiffs Below FILED May 13, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS LOUGHRY, Justice, dissenting: OF WEST VIRGINIA The misguided majority has determined that whether an admitted criminal drug abuser can recover civil monetary damages for the results of his or her drug abuse is a matter to be decided by a jury. Assuming all facts as alleged by the parties are true, there are no even remotely innocent victims here. Rather, there are only individuals who knowingly participated in varying degrees of criminal or grossly reckless…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Barker v. KallashNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Orzel v. Scott Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Price v. Purdue Pharma Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Geoffrey Dugger v. Mary Ann Arredondo, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Joel MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.