Legal Opinion

James Michael Leasing Company v. Paccar, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 26, 2014No. 13-3773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOW, District Judge.

James Michael Leasing Company, LLC purchased a brand-new semi-truck from PACCAR, Incorporated, in 2007. Approximately four years and 3,000 miles later, James Michael Leasing concluded that the truck was a lemon and sought a refund from PACCAR pursuant to Wisconsin’s Lemon Law, Wis. Stat. § 218.0171. 1 PAC-CAR agreed to refund the purchase price, but the parties’ dealings turned sour when a dispute arose over reimbursement of a $53.00 title fee. This seemingly insignificant quibble escalated into a debate over the “reasonable allowance for use” to which PACCAR was entitled…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodas v. SeidlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Scott Weigle v. SPX CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Ronald Burzlaff v. Thoroughbred Motorsports IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Marquez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mark Jacobs v. Carol A. Marcus-RehtmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. HinkleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Klismet's 3 Squares Inc. v. Navistar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  4. Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API