Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Barlow

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The plaintiffs made two principal claims: first, that the written waiver of lien on its face waives only the plaintiffs’ lien or right of lien for “work done, ” and does not operate as a relinquishment of the right of lien for work to be done, and second, that the court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiffs to prove the circumstances under which it was executed, and the purposes for which it was intended, in order to ascertain its true intent.

By way of introduction to these claims, it is argued that the word “waiver” has no definite and rigid meaning in the law, and that is quite true.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hillhouse v. DucaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Weinberg v. ValenteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meyer v. National Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Persky v. PuglisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Capp Industries, Inc. v. SchoenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Bialowans v. MinorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. G. R. Sponaugle & Sons, Inc. v. McKnight Construction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API