Legal Opinion

Hillhouse v. Duca

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 30, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

The appellants attack the judgment of the court in twelve reasons of appeal which are identical in form and claim, and the appellant Kennedy files two additional reasons of appeal assigning error as to the finding by the court as to the date of the commencement of his lien, and in ruling that he was not entitled to interest on his claim. We will first consider these claims. The committee in his report, accepted by the court, expressly finds as a fact that the work by Kennedy upon the Highland Apartments began April 10th, 1920, which date, of course, fixes the time of commencement of the lien.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Morgan v. FarrelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Monterosso v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Weinberg v. ValenteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Camputaro v. Stuart Hardwood Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Division Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Lundstrom Construction Co. v. DygertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Persky v. PuglisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Bland v. BregmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API