Legal Opinion

Smith v. Robertson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 1947No. 15919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. D. Ride, AAJ.:

Pursuant to permission duly granted, this action was instituted in the original jurisdiction of this Court by the petitioner above named against the respondents above named to secure a permanent injunction against the issuance of certain bonds of Charleston County, the petition alleging that the act authorizing and directing the issuance of these bonds is unconstitutional, upon the various grounds therein set forth. The cause was heard by us upon the verified pleadings, including certain exhibits, and the arguments of counsel for the respective parties.

The factual allegations…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Haesloop v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. County of Livingston v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parker v. Bates, TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. School District of Kansas City v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. McLure v. McElroySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. Charleston County Aviation Authority v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Bradley v. City Council of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API