Legal Opinion
Berry v. Robertson
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 1, 1930No. 1403PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity, brought pursuant to the provisions of section 4915 of the-Revised Statutes (35 USCA § 63), whereby the plaintiff seeks to establish his right to a patent for a steam drier used in paper, making machinery in connection with the drying and bleaching of the paper. More specifically, the apparatus involves a hollow rotary drier or cylinder over which the paper sheet travels, the interior of the rotary drier or cylinder being constantly supplied with steam to keep the drier or cylinder hot so as to accomplish the drying function. The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Kemper-Thomas Co. v. J. P. Gordon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. Charles H. Phillips Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Samuel M. Langston Co. v. F. X. Hooper Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1934
- Acme Card System Co. v. Remington-Rand Business Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.