Legal Opinion

State v. Gowdy, 07 Ma 103 (3-17-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2008No. 07 MA 103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Edward Gowdy appeals from his sentence entered in the Youngstown Municipal Court. Appellant argues that the court erred in stating that he would receive credit for electronic monitoring house arrest but then failing to in fact credit him for such time. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

{¶ 2} On May 13, 2007, appellant was charged with domestic violence, child endangering (both first degree misdemeanors) and criminal damaging. On May 24, 2007, appellant pled guilty to child endangering. In return, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GapenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. NagleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. FaulknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. TylerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HelfrichOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. DelaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API