State v. Gowdy, 07 Ma 103 (3-17-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Edward Gowdy appeals from his sentence entered in the Youngstown Municipal Court. Appellant argues that the court erred in stating that he would receive credit for electronic monitoring house arrest but then failing to in fact credit him for such time. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} On May 13, 2007, appellant was charged with domestic violence, child endangering (both first degree misdemeanors) and criminal damaging. On May 24, 2007, appellant pled guilty to child endangering. In return, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. GapenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. NagleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FaulknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. TylerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HelfrichOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DelaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017