Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Murphy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 1961No. 61-238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, TILLMAN, Chief Judge.

The appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, has not paid the costs taxed against it and has not assigned as error the taxation of costs and superseded the judgment taxing the same.1

This case involves the application of the rule to unusual circumstances and we have determined that an opinion is appropriate upon this Order Granting Motion to Dismiss.

The appellant, City of Miami, was the plaintiff in an action in the Civil Court of Record, wherein the city sought to recover from the appellee Lillian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. State v. RushingSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  4. Bredin v. BredinSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  5. Goodwin v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. MurphySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. City of Miami Beach v. CummingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. State Road Department v. BramlettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Miller v. PringleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. State Road Department v. BramlettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API