United Fibertech, Ltd. Kevin T. Twohy, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
United Fibertech, Ltd. appeals the tax court’s order denying it a tax deduction under 26 U.S.C. § 174(a)(1) (1988). We affirm.
The facts are fully developed in the tax court’s opinion reported at United Fibertech, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 62 T.C.M. (CCH) 699 (1991), and we do not repeat them here. Fibertech contends it is entitled to a tax deduction under section 174(a)(1) for research and experimental expenditures paid in connection with a trade or business. The tax court found that Fi-bertech paid another company to conduct research and that Fibertech never intended directly to manufacture or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Snow v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burton L. Spellman and Roslyn Spellman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Louis H. Diamond, Madelene Diamond v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- William L. Zink and Frances P. Zink v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Daniel B. Nickeson and Enid C. Nickeson Norman E. Kuhl and Nancy J. Kuhl v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Cook v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Mach-Tech, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994