Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. Page
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 21, 1965No. A-13645PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRETT, Judge.
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pro se. The Attorney General files, as his response, a demurrer to the petition, for the reason that all the matters specifically alleged therein as ground for the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus are matters which could have and should have been presented on proper appeal to this Court. We agree with the Attorney General’s position.
It is found that the petitioner was represented by counsel, did file his motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and gave notice of intent to appeal. Also, that petitioner was granted 45…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Samford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
- Pooler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Doyal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duvall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water, Both Surface & Underground, Within the Sage Creek Drainage AreaMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Donald R. Maghe v. The State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Rodrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
- Lesley v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.