Rodrick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRETT, Judge:
This is an attempted appeal from a conviction sustained by the plaintiff in- error, defendant below, in the Superior Court of Comanche County, for forgery in the second degree.
The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the case made was not prepared, served, settled and filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals in the manner and time provided by statute.
The Oklahoma statutes provide that an appeal to this Court may be taken by a defendant as a matter of constitutional right from any judgment of conviction rendered against him in a court of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Seabolt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Swink v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Chase v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Canady v. ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Donald Ray Buchanan v. The State of Oklahoma, and Ray Page, Warden of the State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Buchanan v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966