Legal Opinion

Long v. Straus

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1886No. 12,429Published

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion

*99On Petition foe a Rehearing.

Elliott, J.

The instrument declared on is a contract. It is a written contract. It can not be contradicted or varied by parol evidence. The law enters into it as a silent factor, and the obligation implied by law from the language employed is as much part of the contract as though what the law implies had been fully expressed in words.

Where there is an express contract there can be no implied one. An express written contract contains the only competent evidence of the agreement of the parties. There is here an express written contract, and, therefore, there is no…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Payne v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Kimball & Kiniston v. HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1833

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API