Legal Opinion

Amerisure Insurance v. Coleman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2007No. Docket No. 270948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.

Defendant Titan Insurance Company appeals as of right the grant of summary disposition and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Amerisure Insurance Company in this no-fault case. We conclude that the trial court correctly determined that, under the terms of the insurance policy at issue here, Titan was the insurer of the operator of the motor vehicle involved in the accident and therefore liable to provide no-fault benefits under MCL 500.3114(4)(b). We affirm.

BASIC FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Bernard Coleman, Tonya Paige Coleman, and Reginald…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Halloran v. BhanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Omne Financial, Inc v. Shacks, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nastal v. Henderson & Associates Investigations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dobbelaere v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Stone v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. ColemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Beth Bracy v. Yolanda Yvette NicholsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of Michigan v. Robert ElzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API