Legal Opinion
Great West Life & Annuity Insurance v. Moore Ex Rel. Moore
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 21, 2001No. 00 C 1880PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DARRAH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Great-West Life and Annuity Insurance Co. and Chicago Roll Company (“Plaintiffs”) have filed a complaint against Defendants David Moore, Larry Moore, Linda Moore, and Oak Brook Bank (“Defendants”) for reimbursement under an employee benefit plan covered by the Employment Retirement Security Act (“ERISA”). Plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.CrvP. 56. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
LEGAL STANDARD
Summary judgment is appropriate when there remains no…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates' Health & Welfare Fund v. HummellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Alleman v. BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF ILLINOISDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2002
- Bauhaus USA, Inc. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Bauhaus USA, Inc. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Bauhaus USA, Inc. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.