Legal Opinion
Alleman v. BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF ILLINOIS
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 3, 2002No. 4:02-cv-04107Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs motion to remand. (Doc. 11). The defendant has responded. (Doc. 13). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motion to remand.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, John Alleman, is an attorney. At all times relevant to this action, Donna Newcomb (who is not a party) was an employee at Wal-Mart and had health insurance through the “Associates Health and Welfare Plan,” an ERISA plan (hereinafter “the Plan”). The plaintiff alleges that the defendant, Blue Cross / Blue Shield of Illinois, is the plan…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.