Legal Opinion

Equine Practitioners Ass'n, Inc. v. New York State Racing & Wagering Bd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein, and, as so modified, affirmed.

We reject plaintiffs challenge to the rules promulgated by defendant which govern the substances which may be administered to a horse within various time periods preceding a race. We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sidney Asch (105 AD2d 215), that these rules are rationally related to, and authorized by, the statutory provisions they implement, and thus we affirm the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Equine Practitioners Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Zito v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API