Legal Opinion

Equine Practitioners Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Asch, J.

This action seeks to declare invalid rules adopted by the defendant New York State Racing and Wagering Board, effective July 1,1982, which regulate the administration of drugs to racehorses prior to their participation in pari-mutuel races.

The challenged rules are codified at 9 NYCRR parts 4012 and 4043 (as to thoroughbreds) and part 4120 (as to standardbreds). Certain provisions in the rules restrict the administration of drugs to a racehorse prior to the start of a program containing a race in which the horse is to compete. Those sections establish a schedule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Equine Practitioners Ass'n, Inc. v. New York State Racing & Wagering Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Anobile v. PelligrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API