Legal Opinion

Smeester v. Pub-N-Grub, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1991No. Docket No. 133004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGribbs, J.

Plaintiff Pamela Smeester appeals by leave granted from a circuit court order granting defendant’s motion for partial summary disposition with regard to the issue of damages. We reverse.

In 1988, plaintiff worked as a cook for defendant Pub-N-Grub. During the first week of her employment, she injured her left hand in a machine used to roll pizza dough. Defendant did not have workers’ disability compensation insurance and was not an approved self-insurer.

Plaintiff filed suit against defendant, seeking to recover for loss of wages, loss of earning capacity, intangible damages, and medical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lydman v. De HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McGILLIS v. AIDA ENGINEERING, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Erickson v. LeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smeester v. Pub-N-Grub, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Smeester v. Pub-N-Grub, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API