Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendant has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff sued to recover judgment upon an undertaking given by the defendant, as surety for one Charles Bowman, to obtain the release of an attachment issued out of the superior court of Merced County, in an action wherein Passow Sons was the plaintiff and Charles Bowman was defendant. The undertaking was given in pursuance of section 540 of the Code of Civil…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gardner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ferguson v. GlidewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Myers v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1876
- McMillan v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Dillon v. RashSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stowe v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Bezaire v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bank of Santa Ana v. MolinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Koehler v. SerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Kast v. Pacific Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.