Legal Opinion

Kast v. Pacific Surety Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1921No. S. F. No. 9270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

The facts in- this matter were stated in the opinion of the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, division one, as follows:

“This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover upon an undertaking, issued by the defendant, as surety, for the purpose of securing the release from attachment of certain property, attached in an action entitled Allen v. Chatfield.
“The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone, it being agreed that the findings precisely present the facts involved. Allen, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. FargoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Allen v. ChatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hesser v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Preston v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schneider v. ZoellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Jones v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Lane Mortgage Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API