Legal Opinion

United States v. a Certain Tract or Parcel of Land

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided September 24, 1942No. 155PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOVETT, District Judge.

The nature of these proceedings, the statutes under which instituted, conformity with state procedure, etc., are discussed in the opinion of this court of March 30, 1942 (44 F.Supp. 712) and will not be repeated.

Dissatisfied with the jury’s verdict awarding compensation to the owner-condemnee, the government asks for a new trial. Thirteen grounds are set out in the motion. They will be considered in the order they are presented.

The first four grounds are the usual general grounds familiar under the Georgia practice, viz., that the verdict is contrary to evidence,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. Creek NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Dorothy Blankinship, United States of America v. Dorothy BlankinshipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Bern-Shaw Ltd. Partnership v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. In re Appropriation of Property of EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. 40,379 Square Feet of LandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API