Legal Opinion
Chuck v. Hewlett Packard Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2006No. 04-36094PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Kenneth Chuck appeals the district court’s grant of the summary judgment motion put forward by several Hewlett Packard Company defendants (collectively, “HP”). Chuck’s principal claim is that the Hewlett Packard Company Deferred Prof-ib-Sharing Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), which is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., owes him additional retirement benefits arising from his employment at HP until 1980. He also seeks relief for the Plan’s alleged breach of its fiduciary duties and for its failure…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Chuck v. Hewlett Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Withrow v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Miller v. Rite Aid Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- James v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.