Legal Opinion
Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co. v. Ralph N. Brodie Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 1943No. 22086-GPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit wherein The Hydraulic Press Manufacturing Company, an Ohio corporation, charges the infringement of certain United States Letters Patents relating to an hydraulic metal drawing press.
The complaint named The Ralph N. Brodie Company, a California corporation, and Baldwin-Southwark Division of the Baldwin Locomotive Works, a Pennsylvania corporation, along with fictitious parties, as defendants. Service of process upon the defendant Baldwin-Southwark Division of the Baldwin Locomotive Works was quashed for lack of venue and the action' dismissed as to it.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ralph N. Brodie Co. v. Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Vegetable Oil Products Co. v. Dorward & Sons Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1943