Legal Opinion

Bolus v. United Penn Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1987No. 1187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal arises from the grant of summary judgment to plaintiffs-appellees Robert C. Bolus, D.B. & B. Realty Company, Inc. and Key Brockway, Inc. (“Bolus”) in an action for a declaratory judgment. The defendant-appellant is The United Penn Bank (the “Bank”).

Robert C. Bolus and the two appellee corporations, both of which are solely owned by Bolus, have for some time been engaged in the trucking business. In connection with this business, beginning in 1977 Bolus secured various types of financing from the Bank. One of the loans the Bank extended to Bolus was a $500,000 loan made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Mains v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Mid-Centre County Authority v. Township of BoggsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andursky v. AndurskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. General Refractories Co. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Erie Insurance Group v. CavalierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Fugo v. Ehlenbach, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API