Legal Opinion

Eisner v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1951No. 7675Published

1Opinion of the Court

120 Utah 675 (1951)

238 P.2d 416

EISNER

v.

SALT LAKE CITY (Bonneru, Third-Party Defendant and Respondent).

No. 7675.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Decided December 5, 1951.

Rawlings, Wallace, Black, Roberts & Black, and Dwight L. King, all of Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Christensen, Holmgren & Kesler, Salt Lake City, defendant, third-party plaintiff and respondent.

McCullough, Boyce & McCullough, Salt Lake City, third-party defendant and respondent.

HENRIOD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff's action against respondents, for injuries alleged to have resulted from a fall on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Burns v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. Eisner v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Roth v. Verona BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Ryan v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API