Legal Opinion
Christopher v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 1, 1993No. 1:89-CV-0653PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
SCHELL, District Judge.
CAME ON TO BE CONSIDERED Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Original Complaint. After reviewing the motion, the response in opposition, the reply to the response in opposition, the letters submitted by both sets of parties, and the pleadings of record, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
In July of 1989, Gerald Christopher, Charles Prunty, and Billy Turner (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) filed suit in this court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- The Sommers Drug Stores Co. Employee Profit Sharing Trust, Cross-Appellant v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc. And Walter N. Corrigan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Constantine v. American Airlines Pension Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
- Williams on Behalf of Williams v. Jackson Stone Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- Aforigho v. Tape Products Company (TPC)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2020