Tarrant Service Agency, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. American Standard, Inc., D/B/A the Trane Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Tarrant Service Agency (“Tar-rant”), appeals • the District Court’s order granting defendant, American Standard, Inc., d/b/a The Trane Company (“Trane”), judgment as a matter of law after the jury had returned a verdict for Tarrant in this action for monopolization and attempted monopolization. Although the District Court granted Trane judgment as a matter of law on these claims, Trane cross-appeals- the District Court’s refusal to grant Trane’s alternative motion for a new trial on the monopolization and attempted monopolization claim. Tar-rant also appeals…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Sarah N. PHELPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YALE SECURITY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Andrew Byars v. Bluff City News Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- American Council Of Certified Podiatric Physicians And Surgeons v. American Board Of Podiatric Surgery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Coast Cities Truck Sales, Inc. v. Navistar International Transportation Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Cupp v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.