Legal Opinion
The Dow Chemical Company v. American Cyanamid Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 8, 1987No. Appeal 85-2749PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, 615 F.Supp. 471, 229 USPQ 171 (1985), holding that certain claims of plaintiff-appellee Dow Chemical Company’s (Dow) U.S. Patents No. Re 31,430 (’430 reissue patent), No. 3,994,973 (’973 patent), and No. 3,642,894 (’894 patent), are not invalid and were infringed by defendant-appellant American Cyanamid Company (Cyanamid), and that Dow’s U.S. Patent No. Re 31,356 (the ’356 reissue patent) is not invalid but was not infringed by Cyanamid. The parties do not in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Dow Chemical Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Advanced Display Systems, Inc. v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Joy Manufacturing Co. v. CGM Valve & Gauge Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1989
- Messerschmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Ultradent Products, Inc. v. Life-Like Cosmetics, Inc. D/B/A Life-Like Dental Products and Rodney F. OgrinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.