Legal Opinion
Dow Chemical Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 15, 1985No. Civ. A. 82-2355PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEER, District Judge.
The Dow Chemical Company 1 (“Dow”) instituted this action against American Cyanamid Company 2 (“Cyanamid”) seeking injunctive relief and damages based on Cyanamid’s alleged infringement of Dow’s U.S. Patent No. 3,631,104 (“the ‘104 patent”), Reissue Patent No. 31,430 (“the ‘430 reissue patent”), U.S. Patent No. 3,994,973 (“the ‘973 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 3,642,-894 (“the ‘894 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 3,758,578 (“the '578 patent”), and Reissue Patent No. 31,356 (“the ‘356 reissue patent”). Four of these patents, the ‘104 patent, the ‘430 reissue patent, which is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- The Dow Chemical Company v. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.