Legal Opinion
Cox v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 9, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-1340-MLBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BE LOT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on separate motions for summary judgment by defendants The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) and District Lodge No. 70 of the International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (“the Union”). (Docs. 53 & 55). Plaintiff Jim D. Cox (“plaintiff’) filed this suit against Boeing and the Union, asserting a claim under section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U-S.C. § 185. Section 301 gives federal courts subject-matter jurisdiction over “[sjuits for violation of contracts between an employer…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sutherland v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Mangrum v. U S West Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1996
- Pegump v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1996