Legal Opinion
Hydro Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 25, 1989No. 190-87CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Judge.
In 1985, the Department of Interior awarded plaintiff a contract to inject cement slurry into an abandoned coal mine below the town of Portercrest, Alabama. The contract was necessary to reduce the danger of subsidence. Plaintiff, Hydro Group, Inc., filed this suit seeking payment for two chemicals added to the grout.
In performing the contract, plaintiff used two chemical additives — bentonite and plas-ticizer. Bentonite controls the viscosity of the grout mixture; plasticizer controls the grout’s flexibility during pumping. After completing the contract work, plaintiff…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steve Altman Photography v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989