Legal Opinion

Gur v. v. Nadav, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 2018No. 917 EDA 2017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.E.:

Jonathan Nadav, Appellant/Borrower, appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas denying his petition to strike and/or open the confessed judgment entered against him by Victor Gur, Appellee/Lender. After careful review, we affirm the trial court’s order in all respects except on Appellant’s claim for offset, which we remand to the trial court for appropriate resolution.

The trial court aptly sets forth the case history as follows:

On March 18, 2016, defendant Jonathan Nadav (hereinafter “Borrower”), executed a Commercial Judgment Promissory Note (the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Copley Qu-Wayne AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Ferrick v. BianchiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Midwest Financial Acceptance Corp. v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Neducsin, D. v. Caplan, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. FARHANGUI v. GROSSINGERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. GROSSINGER v. FARHANGUIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Live Oak Banking Company v. Applebrook, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Michael's LA Veranda v. Riverstone RiverfrontSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API