Legal Opinion
GROSSINGER v. FARHANGUI
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00745Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOUGLAS R. GROSSINGER, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. BIJAN FARHANGUI, NO. 20-745 Defendant. BIJAN FARHANGUI, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. GROSSINGER, NO. 20-2002 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2018, Douglas Grossinger borrowed $100,000 from Bijan Farhangui. After repaying $85,000, Grossinger stopped paying and sued Farhangui for unjust enrichment as well as for usury under Pennsylvania’s Loan Interest and Protection Law, 41 Pa. C.S.A. § 101 et seq. (“LIPL”). Farhangui has filed a motion to dismiss.1…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kathleen Buck v. The Hampton Township School District Lawrence C. Korchnak, DrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Budhun v. Reading Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.