State v. Brun
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
NOYES, Judge.
After he was charged with a misdemeanor, Defendant filed a demand for jury trial and a motion to suppress his statements. While the motion was pending, the State obtained dismissal of the misdemeanor and re-filed the case as a felony. Defendant then moved to dismiss the felony charge on grounds of presumed prosecutorial vindictiveness. The trial court granted the motion and the State appealed. Because we conclude that the facts show no reasonable likelihood of prosecutorial vindictiveness, we reverse the dismissal and remand for reinstatement of the felony charge.
I
During a July…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Christine Meyer United States of America v. Theresa Fitzgibbon United States of America v. Virginia SendersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BruleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MiegCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. DansdillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.