Los Angeles Tile Jobbers v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case is described on the invoice as terrazzo floor tiles and was assessed with duty at 24 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 202(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739, supplemented by T.D. 52857, as floor tiles valued over 40 cents per square foot, wholly or in part of cement. It is claimed in the amendment to the protest that it is properly dutiable at 8 cents per superficial foot under paragraph 232(b) of said tariff act, as modified by the Annecy Protocol…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- United States v. Linen Thread Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Selectile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Louisville Bedding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.