Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Delaware Olds, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 24, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

The issue in this case is whether the Trial Judge abused his discretion in granting, a party relief from judgment under Superior Court Rule 60(b). 1 This narrow issue, however, must be examined against the broad factual and procedural background of what is now a complex action.

I

Michael Dixon (plaintiff) brought the action for false imprisonment and assault and battery. There are four defendants: Delaware Olds, Inc., an automobile dealership; William Luke, Jr., president of Delaware Olds; Robert Eckenrode, operator of a security guard service engaged by Delaware Olds; and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Davidson v. DixonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  3. Jewell v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Elizabeth Annat v. Daniel B. Beard and Warren J. Hamilton, Elizabeth Annat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. Delaware Olds, Inc. v. DixonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MCA, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
  3. State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Shipley v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. City of Dover v. HunterSuperior Court of Delaware · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API