Dixon v. Delaware Olds, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
The issue in this case is whether the Trial Judge abused his discretion in granting, a party relief from judgment under Superior Court Rule 60(b). 1 This narrow issue, however, must be examined against the broad factual and procedural background of what is now a complex action.
I
Michael Dixon (plaintiff) brought the action for false imprisonment and assault and battery. There are four defendants: Delaware Olds, Inc., an automobile dealership; William Luke, Jr., president of Delaware Olds; Robert Eckenrode, operator of a security guard service engaged by Delaware Olds; and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Davidson v. DixonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Jewell v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Elizabeth Annat v. Daniel B. Beard and Warren J. Hamilton, Elizabeth Annat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Delaware Olds, Inc. v. DixonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- MCA, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Shipley v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- City of Dover v. HunterSuperior Court of Delaware · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.