Jewell v. Division of Social Services
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HORSEY, Justice:.
Appellant seeks relief under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure from a stipulated dismissal, without prejudice, of his appeal from an adverse Family Court decision awarding custody of his former wife’s children to the Division of Social Services of Delaware.
After the Superior Court had ordered a trial de novo of the case on appeal counsel, before trial, entered into a stipulation concerning custody of the children, on the basis of which a consent order of dismissal was entered under Rule 41(a)(1)(H).
Appellant seeks relief from the judgment because…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Keystone Fuel Oil Co. v. Del-Way Petroleum, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Bachtle v. BachtleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Keith v. Melvin L. Joseph Construction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1982
- Schremp v. MarvelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.