Legal Opinion

Burch v. a & G Associates, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1983No. Docket 59021PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, J.

Defendants appeal by leave granted from the trial court’s entry of an order denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs accept the statement of facts as presented in defendants’ brief on appeal*

Plaintiffs filed this action on May 24, 1978. The complaint was first amended on December 11, 1979, and for a second time on June 25, 1980.

The second amended complaint alleges that Lawrence McDonald was the agent and employee of defendants and was under their control, and that the cause of action arises out of the use and operation of a taxicab owned by defendant Checker. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bradley v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Martin v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Thomas v. Checker Cab Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheila Arbour, Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Arbour v. Eugene JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Leitch v. SwitchenkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Janice v. HondzinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Green v. SHELL OIL COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Gulf Underwriters Insurance v. KSI Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API