Thomas v. Checker Cab Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.
We are asked to decide here whether a person injured by the tortious conduct of a "Checker” taxicab driver has presented sufficient proofs to impose liability upon defendant, Checker Cab Company. We hold that proof that the company is furnishing services to these taxicabs, such as a trade name, headquarters, or radio dispatching, is sufficient to avoid a directed verdict prior to defendant’s proofs.
Plaintiffs, Gilmer and Dorothy Thomas, were *155injured in an automobile accident occurring on June 21, 1970. Plaintiffs’ car collided with a Checker taxicab driven by Wendell West, and owned by Tim…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Syracuse Water Co. v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Boucher v. ThomsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Burns v. Michigan Paint Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Fullerton v. Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Little v. Howard Johnson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lincoln v. GuptaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Irving v. Doctors Hosp. of Lake Worth, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Smoot v. MarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.