Legal Opinion

Steele v. Steele

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 10, 1946No. Civil Action 30977PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, Justice.

This is an action-by a woman against her former husband for assault committed after a decree of absolute divorce between them had been entered, but before the decree became effective. The defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that the action may not be maintained. Counsel for the defendant urges that it is still the law in the District of Columbia that a married woman may not sue for assault committed on her by her husband during coverture and that this rule requires a dismissal of this action.

Originally, at common law, a man had a legal right to beat his wife…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Apitz v. DamesOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bencomo v. BencomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Luna Dale Roscoe v. Joseph A. RoscoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Rommel v. West American Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Felicia Page Davis and Glenn W. Davis v. Phyllis O. Harrod and Dennette HarrodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API