Legal Opinion

Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Sedgwick

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth District.

1Opinion of the Court

This case was first argued at the January Term, 1860, and a decision forthwith being desired by the parties, judgment was announced from the Bench, reversing the judgment below. Subsequently, a reargument was ordered, and at the April Term, the opinion of the Court was delivered by Baldwin, J.

Cope, J. concurring.

Erwin Davis, in March, 1859, recovered judgment against the Columbia and Stanislaus River Water Company, and on the ninth of May afterward, sold their ditch under execution. On the ninth November, 1859, the Tuolumne Redemption Company redeemed from Davis, it being assignee of three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  2. Whitney v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Iverson v. ShorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hooker v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Moore v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Yancey v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API