Legal Opinion

Western Greyhound Lines v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1958No. Civ. 23341PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Proceeding in mandamus to compel the superior court to dismiss an action and to command the clerk thereof not to transmit the action to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.

On November 28, 1956, Elizabeth Ritchie, the real party in interest, filed an action in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles for damages for personal injuries. The complaint named petitioner as a defendant and alleged that about July 16, 1956, the plaintiff sustained personal injuries in the vicinity of the San Francisco terminal of petitioner. Thereafter petitioner filed in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Maxwell v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Roraback v. RorabackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Simon v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. Wong v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Bechtel Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Talman v. TalmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API