Bellingham Bay Lumber Co. v. Western Amusement Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying dismissal of action. John L. Childs, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an action to foreclose a material-man’s lien. Rudolph Spreckels was the owner of the property sought to be impressed with the plaintiff’s lien at the time of the erection of the building for which the plaintiff’s materials were supplied to the Western Amusement Company, a sub-lessee of said Spreckels, by whom the building was being erected. On March 30, 1908, the plaintiff filed its claim of lien against the building and premises for material furnished by it. On April 13, 1908, Rudolph Spreckels conveyed the property affected by said lien to the Realty & Rebuilding Company, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Modoc Land & Livestock Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Alferitz v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- National Diversified Services, Inc. v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Frohman v. BonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Sauer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Rollaway Window Screen Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.